After careful analysis, it has been determined that a positive correlation exists between the possession of Object A (designated as "Pelt") and the insertion of Object B (defined as "Thumb"). Object B was rarely utilized outside that presence of Object A. Furthermore, the number of insertions of Object B ("Thumb") is inversely related to Item C (the number of words vocalized by the Subject). Thus, if A affects B and B affects C then A must also affect C.
Further study of the statistics revealed that the number of possessions of Object A was dependent on the caregiver present at any given time. Caregivers 1 and 2 ("Mommy" and "Daddy") showed significantly less numbers of possession than Caregiver 3 (Grammy, also known as "Mimi").
Conclusion: In order for the Subject to increase his spoken utterances, he will have to forego Object A and Object B. The Subject has demonstrated a capacity to achieve this goal, but each caregiver must conform to the same standards.
Or in layman's terms: Pelt is going to have to be left behind so that Max will not suck his thumb as often and will talk more. Be strong, Mimi.
3 comments:
Perrin also called his Grammy (my mom) "Mimi" until just recently. The "Gr" consonant cluster must be a tough one to master!
You can do it, Max! We know you can! :)
Ain't no baby no mo. I think it's time for "Boy to the Max!"
I think Max's growth and development will be harder for "Mimi" than for Max! hee hee
Post a Comment